The Last Long Look
Vetting 25 candidates for a Position of Trust within a major Religious Organization
Industry: Religious Institutions and Faith-Based Organizations
Client: A Major Religious Organization
Service: Limited Background Due Diligence Investigation
On the other end of the line was an attorney representing a major religious organization with more than 400 members of the clergy and approximately one million faithful in the United States. He had been referred to Hillard Heintze by a colleague and was aware of the firm's significant record of support to other major religious organizations with respect to investigations and security matters.
"We would like your assistance," he said, "in conducting strategic due diligence and background investigations on 25 members of the clergy we are considering as candidates for a very senior position of trust within our organization."
The Hillard Heintze Solution
As the conversation unfolded, CEO Arnette Heintze gained a better perspective on the institution's objectives and the internal processes these investigations would support. "Let me suggest this," he said. "If you insist on a full-scale, strategic investigation of each of these 25 individuals, we will be happy to comply. But that will be a significant expense for you. I think there's a better way to accomplish your goals at a dramatically lower cost to the organization."
As the conversation ended, Heintze and the attorney agreed that it made more sense to have Hillard Heintze first complete limited-scope investigations on the 25 candidates and then, once the list had been narrowed down, conduct a full-scope strategic due diligence review of the three finalists for this particular position.
Impact on the Client's Business
Two weeks later, the full-length report of key investigative findings prepared by Hillard Heintze provided this ecclesiastical selection committee with high-level information on each of the 25 candidates for this critical position. Areas reviewed included, for example, civil litigation records, bankruptcy filings, criminal records and sex offender registrations, tax liens and negative press, trade or media reports. At present, the committee is using this information, as well as many other factors, to winnow the list down to three final candidates.